International Journal of Yoga
Users online: 345 
Ahead of print | Login 
Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size 
About us Editors Current Issue Past Issues Instructions submission Subscribe Advertise

   Table of Contents     
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 128-133
Effectiveness of mindfulness meditation on pain and quality of life of patients with chronic low back pain

1 Department of Psychology, Panjanb University, Chandigarh, India
2 Member Young Researchers and Elite Club, Ardabil Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardebil, Iran

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication10-Jun-2015


Background and Aim: Recovery of patients with chronic low back pain (LBP) is depended on several physical and psychological factors. Therefore, the authors aimed to examine the efficacy of mindfulness based stress reduction (MBSR) as a mind-body intervention on quality of life and pain severity of female patients with nonspecific chronic LBP (NSCLBP).
Effectiveness of mindfulness meditation on pain and quality of life of patients with chronic low back pain Eighty-eight patients diagnosed as NSCLBP by physician and randomly assigned to experimental (MBSR+ usual medical care) and the control group (usual medical care only). The subjects assessed in 3 times frames; before, after and 4 weeks after intervention by Mac Gil pain and standard brief quality of life scales. Data obtained from the final sample analyzed by ANCOVA using SPSS software.
Results: The findings showed MBSR was effective in reduction of pain severity and the patients who practiced 8 sessions meditation reported significantly lower pain than patients who only received usual medical care. There was a significant effect of the between subject factor group (F [1, 45] = 16.45, P < 0.001) and (F [1, 45] = 21.51, P < 0.001) for physical quality of life and (F [1, 45] = 13.80, P < 0.001) and (F [1, 45] = 25.07, P < 0.001) mental quality of life respectively.
Conclusion: MBSR as a mind-body therapy including body scan, sitting and walking meditation was effective intervention on reduction of pain severity and improvement of physical and mental quality of life of female patients with NSCLBP.

Keywords: Chronic low back pain; mindfulness based stress reduction; pain; quality of life; SF-12

How to cite this article:
Banth S, Ardebil MD. Effectiveness of mindfulness meditation on pain and quality of life of patients with chronic low back pain. Int J Yoga 2015;8:128-33

How to cite this URL:
Banth S, Ardebil MD. Effectiveness of mindfulness meditation on pain and quality of life of patients with chronic low back pain. Int J Yoga [serial online] 2015 [cited 2023 Feb 2];8:128-33. Available from:

   Introduction Top

In nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP) the pain is not related to conditions such as fractures, spondylitis, direct trauma, or neoplastic, infectious, vascular, metabolic, or endocrine-related although it is a cause of limitation in daily activities due to actual pain or fear of pain. [1] Unfortunately, the majority of LBP patients (80-90%) suffers from nonspecific LBP which leads to considerable pain-related disability and limitation in daily activities. [1],[2 ] Chronic LBP is not only prevalent, but is also a source of great physical disability, role impairment, and diminished psychological well-being and quality of life. [1]

Prior to the current accepted biopsychosocial model, the biomedical model dominated all illness conceptualizations for almost 300 years and still dominates in the popular imagination. First proposed by Engel (1977) the biopsychosocial model acknowledges biological processes but also highlights the importance of experiential and psychological factors in pain. The famous gate control theory of pain [3] also proposed that the brain plays a dynamic role in pain perception as opposed to being a passive recipient of pain signals. They suggested psychological factors can inhibit or enhance sensory flow of pain signals and thus influence the way brain ultimately responds to painful stimulation. [4] If mind processes can change the way the brain processes pain then this holds tremendous potential for psychological intervention to produce reduced pain signals from the brain.

Kabat-Zinn's et al. (1986) described the process of pain reduction in his paper on mindfulness and meditation. The process of pain reduction occurred by "an attitude of detached observation toward a sensation when it becomes prominent in the field of awareness and to observe with similar detachment the accompanying but independent cognitive processes which lead to evaluation and labeling of the sensation as painful, as hurt." Thus, by "uncoupling" the physical sensation, from the emotional and cognitive experience of pain, the patient is able to reduce the pain. [5] The patients' descriptions of distraction from pain, identifying maladaptive coping strategies toward pain and heightened awareness of pain sensation leading to behavioral changes are examples of how pain is unassociated with emotion, cognition, and sensation [Figure 1]. Therefore recently these theories attracted several researchers who are working on pain.
Figure 1: Consort diagram

Click here to view

Mindfulness meditation has roots in Buddhist Vipassana philosophy and practice and has been independently adopted within clinical psychology in Western societies. [6],[7],[8],[9] Recently in Netherlands Veehof et al. conducted a systematic review of controlled and noncontrolled studies on effectiveness of acceptance-based interventions such as mindfulness-based stress reduction program, acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain. Primary outcomes measured were pain intensity and depression. Secondary outcomes measured were anxiety, physical well-being and quality of life. [10] Twenty-two studies randomized controlled studies clinical controlled studies without randomization and noncontrolled studies were included totaling 1235 patients with chronic pain. An effect size on pain of (0.37) was found in the controlled studies. The effect on depression was (0.32). The authors concluded that ACT and mindfulness interventions had similar effects to other cognitive-behavioral therapy interventions and that these types of interventions may be a useful alternative or adjunct to current therapies. Chiesa and Serretti also conducted another systematic review on 10 mindfulness interventions. [11] The main findings were that these interventions produced small nonspecific effects in terms of reducing chronic pain and symptoms of depression. When compared to active control groups (support and education) no additional significant effects were noted.

In summary, there is a need for further studies into the specific effects of mindfulness studies on chronic pain. Regarding as the researcher knowledge efficacy of mindfulness has not been explored on quality of life of chronic pain patients in Iran. The authors aimed to examine the impact of mindfulness based stress reduction (MBSR) protocol designed for pain management on quality of life and pain of a homogeneous sample of females with nonspecific chronic LBP (NSCLBP) in comparison of the usual medical care group.

   Methods Top


Out of initial female samples aged 30-45 (n = 155) who diagnosed as chronic NSLBP by physicians in physiotherapy centers of Ardebil-Iran at least 6 months before. Only 88 met inclusion criteria and gave consent to participate in the research program. Patients were randomly assigned in small groups to receive MBSR plus medical usual care (experimental group) and medical usual care (control group). Some patients dropped during and after the treatment. The final sample of the study comprised of 48 females.

   Inclusion criteria Top

  • Age 30-45 years
  • Being under medical treatments like physiotherapy and medicine
  • Medical problem-history of NSCLBP and persisting pain for at least 6 months
  • Language - Persian
  • Gender - female
  • Qualification - educated at least up to high school
  • Consent and willingness to alternative and complementary therapies for pain management.

   Exclusion criteria Top

  • History of spine surgery
  • Combination with other chronic disease
  • Psychotherapy in the last 2 years excluded
  • Unavailability in next 3 months.
The proposal of study approved by the scientific committee of "Panjab University," psychology department and all patients signed consent to participate in the present study. The study approved in India (in the university which researcher done her PhD), but conducted in Iran because researcher is from Iran originally and there was language and culture difference problem. Approval from Institutional Ethics Committee of physiotherapy center of Ardebil was obtained in Iran also to carry out the research.

   Design Top

The study made use of the pre-post quasi time series experimental design to assess the efficacy of MBSR in 3 times frames (before-after-4 weeks after the program). A MBSR program administered one session per week for explaining techniques, practice, and feedback and share their experience for 8 weeks beside 30-45 min' daily home practice [Table 1]. The intervention was conducted in three groups included 7-9 participants in each group. The process of framing the program was based on the quid lines provided by Kabat-Zinn, Morone (2008a, 2008b and 2007) [6],[12],[13],[14] and some adaptation done for the patients involved in the study. The control group was not offered any type of intervention in the research project. Consequently, they underwent the normal routines in healthcare including physiotherapy and medicine.
Table 1: Content of MBSR sessions

Click here to view

   Intervention Top

The sessions conducted in a private physiatrist clinic near to physiotherapy centers. Sessions took 8 weeks, and each session lasted for 90 min. Meditation transformed the patients' awareness through the techniques of breathing and mindfulness. The intervention was conducted in small groups included 7-9 participants in each group. [Table 1] for details of session's content which prepared according books and previous studies. [6],[12],[13],[14]

   Assessments Top

The questionnaire completed by patients before the intervention, after intervention and 4 weeks after the interventions. The receptor of physiotherapy centers conducted the assessment. The receptors trained before conducting the assessment, and they were blind for the hypothesis of the study. The following are used for assessment of participants:

   McGill Pain questionnaire Top

The main component of this scale consists of 15 descriptive adjectives, 11 sensory including: Throbbing, Shooting, Stabbing, Sharp, Cramping, Gnawing, Hot-burning, Aching, Heavy, Tender, Splitting, and four affective including: Tiring-exhausting, Sickening, Fearful, Punishing-cruel, which are rated by the patients according to their severity on a four point scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe), yielding three scores. The sensory and affective scores are calculated by adding sensory and affective item values separately, and the total score is the sum of the two above-mentioned scores. In this study, we just used pain rating index with total scores. Adelmanesh et al., [15] translated and validated Iran version of this questionnaire.

   Quality of life (SF-12) Top

The quality of life assessed by the validated SF-12 Health Survey. [16] It was developed as a shorter, quicker-to-complete alternative to the SF-36v2 Health Survey and measures the same eight health constructs. The constructs are: Physical functioning; role physical; bodily pain; general health; vitality; social functioning; role emotional; and mental health. Items have five response choices (for example: All of the time, most of the time, some of the time, a little of the time, none of the time), apart from two questions for which there are three response choices (for the physical functioning domain). Four items are reverse scored. Summed raw scores in the eight domains are transformed to convert the lowest possible score to zero and the highest possible score to 100. Higher scores represent better health and well-being. The standard form SF-12 uses a time frame of the past 4 weeks. [16]

The Iranian version of SF-12 in Montazeri et al. (2011) study showed satisfactory internal consistency for both summary measures, that are the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS); Cronbach's α for PCS-12 and MCS-12 was 0.73 and 0.72, respectively. The known - group comparison showed that the SF-12 discriminated well between men and women and those who differed in age and educational status (P < 0.001) 2.5. [17]

   Statistical analysis Top

The SPSS 20 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp) was used to analysis of data. For descriptive analysis mean, standard deviation (SD) used. For performing ANCOVA, the pretest scores were used as covariates.

   Results Top

The mean age was 40.3, SD = 8.2. 45% of females were working and the rest were a house wife. 38% had two children, 55% one child and the rest did have children. All were married and from middle-income families. 9.8% of patients reported very low physical quality of life, and the rest were low (54.8%) and moderate (36.4%). This was 12.4%, 40% and 47.6% very low, low and medium levels of mental quality of life in patients participated in our study (n = 48). The mean and SD of patients in MBSR and control group showed a decrease in pain and increase in mental and physical quality of life [Table 2].
Table 2: Mean and SD of patients in pain, mental and physical quality of life in baseline, after intervention and 4 weeks after intervention

Click here to view

   Comparative results Top


The results indicated that after adjusting for pretest scores, there was a significant effect of the between subject factor group (F [(1, 45)] =110.4, P < 0.001) and (F [(1, 45)] =115.8, P < 0.001). Adjusted post-test scores suggest that the intervention had an effect on increasing the pain scores of the NSCLBP patients who received the MBSR as compared to those who were in the control group and did not receive any mind-body therapy [Table 3].
Table 3: The result of comparison of pain and quality of life of MBSR and control group after intervention (time 1) and 4 weeks after intervention (time 2)

Click here to view

Quality of life

The results shows that after adjusting for pretest scores, there was a significant effect of the between subject factor group (F [(1, 45)] =16.45, P < 0.001) and (F [(1, 45)] =21.51, P < 0.001). Adjusted post-test scores suggest that the intervention had an effect on increasing the physical quality of life scores of the NSCLBP patients who received the MBSR as compared to those who were in the control group and did not receive any mind-body therapy [Table 3].

The results also showed that after adjusting for pretest scores, there was a significant effect of the between subject factor group (F [(1, 45)] =13.80, P < 0.001) and (F [(1, 45)] =25.07, P < 0.001). Adjusted post-test scores suggest that the intervention had an effect on increasing the mental quality of life scores of the NSCLBP patients who received the MBSR as compared to those who were in the control group and did not receive any psychological therapy [Table 3].

   Discussion Top

The results showed that the experimental group who were subjected to the MBSR showed a significant improvement in their overall pain severity, physical and mental quality of life scores due to the training received as compared to the control group who received only usual medical care. The program reduced pain perception and enhanced both physical and mental quality of life and impacted on the experimental group clearly in comparison of the usual medical care. Baranoff et al., 2013, [18] Nyklνcek and Kuijpers, 2008, [19] and Morone (2) et al., 2008 [20] reported the same results.

Kabat-Zinn et al. believed the process of pain reduction occurred by "uncoupling" the physical sensation, from the emotional and cognitive experience of pain, the patient is able to reduce the pain. [21] In the current study, the participants uncoupled the different components of the experience of pain. Breathing exercise distract their mind from pain to breathing and mindful living made them aware about maladaptive coping strategies.

In the first session, information given about the fundamentals of mindfulness, describing the mindfulness supporting attitudes included being nonjudgmental toward thought, emotions or sensations as they arise, patience, nonstriving, compassion, acceptance and curiosity gave them a wisdom and believe that they are suffering from painful thoughts more than the pain itself.

Furthermore, during body scan practice they learned to see their real body conditions, as it truly was, without trying to change the reality. Accepting their chronic illness condition helped them see the other possible abilities in their social and emotional roles. In fact the body scan practice helped them change the relationship with their body and pain. Through direct experience in body scan, one realizes the interconnection between the state of the mind and the body, and thereby increases patients' self-control over their life. Mindful living techniques also improved their quality of life by teaching them to pay more attention to their daily life necessities, which led to the experience of subtle positive emotions, like peace and joy, self-esteem and confidence. Furthermore, they appreciated positive things. Once they learned to see the persistent pain objectively and observe other sensations in their body, they applied the same principles through mindful living techniques in their everyday life. As a result, they learned how to manage their health and began to engage in their duties mindfully.

A number of research studies such as Plews-Ogan et al., [22] Grossman et al., [23] and Sephton et al., (2007) [24] showed effectiveness of mindfulness meditation program on quality of life of patients with chronic pain conditions.

   Conclusion Top

All together the result of this study and previous studies highlighted the effectiveness of complementary and alternative treatment for patients with chronic LBP. Regarding the considerable role of quality of life in professional and personal life designing the effective psychotherapies especially for enhancement of quality of life of patients with chronic LBP strongly suggested by the authors.

This study involved with several limitations such as ununiformed usual care received by patients. The provided physiotherapy sessions or methods and medicine prescribed by different physicians in slightly different manner. Although some patients commonly dose not completed physiotherapy sessions. The sample size was small and it was only limited to three centers. This is suggested for future researchers to conduct study with considering physiologic variables such as MRI, NMR and neurologic signals to test the efficacy of MBSR to decrease pain sufferer.

In conclusion, more evidence-based larger scale researches with longer-term follow-up need to be done to increase the therapeutic weight and value of MBSR as a part of complementary alternative medicine being preventive and rehabilitation method among CLBP patients.

   Acknowledgment Top

We are thankful from patients who were corporate with us. Dr. Afzalifard and staff of physiotherapy centers of Ardebil.

   References Top

Waddell G. The Back Pain Revolution. London, England: Churchill Livingstone; 1998.  Back to cited text no. 1
Kovacs FM, Abraira V, Zamora J, Fernández C, Spanish Back Pain Research Network. The transition from acute to subacute and chronic low back pain: A study based on determinants of quality of life and prediction of chronic disability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30:1786-92.  Back to cited text no. 2
Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: A new theory. Science 1965;150:971-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
Beverly ET. Cognitive Therapy for Chronic Pain: A Step-by-Step Guide. USA: The Guilford Press; 2010.  Back to cited text no. 4
Kabat-Zinn J, Lipworth L, Burney R, Sellers W. Four-Year Follow-up of a meditation-based program for the self-regulation of chronic pain: Treatment outcomes and compliance. Clin J Pain 1986;2:159-73.  Back to cited text no. 5
Wetherell JL, Afari N, Rutledge T, Sorrell JT, Stoddard JA, Petkus AJ, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy for chronic pain. Pain 2011;152:2098-107.  Back to cited text no. 6
Baer RA. Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: A conceptual and empirical review. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 2003;10:125-43.  Back to cited text no. 7
Kabat-Zinn J. An outpatient program in behavioral medicine for chronic pain patients based on the practice of mindfulness meditation: Theoretical considerations and preliminary results. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1982;4:33-47.  Back to cited text no. 8
Glombiewski JA, Hartwich-Tersek J, Rief W. Two psychological interventions are effective in severely disabled, chronic back pain patients: A randomised controlled trial. Int J Behav Med 2010;17:97-107.  Back to cited text no. 9
Veehof MM, Oskam MJ, Schreurs KM, Bohlmeijer ET. Acceptance-based interventions for the treatment of chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain 2011;152:533-42.  Back to cited text no. 10
Chiesa A, Serretti A. Mindfulness-based interventions for chronic pain: A systematic review of the evidence. J Altern Complement Med 2011;17:83-93.  Back to cited text no. 11
Morone NE, Greco CM, Weiner DK. Mindfulness meditation for the treatment of chronic low back pain in older adults: A randomized controlled pilot study. Pain 2008;134:310-9.  Back to cited text no. 12
Kabat-Zinn J. Full Catastrophe Living: Using the Wisdom of Your Body and Mind to Face Stress, Pain and Illness. New York: Dell Publishing; 1990.  Back to cited text no. 13
Morone NE, Greco CM. Mind-body interventions for chronic pain in older adults: A structured review. Pain Med 2007;8:359-75.  Back to cited text no. 14
Adelmanesh F, Arvantaj A, Rashki H, Ketabchi S, Montazeri A, Raissi G. Results from the translation and adaptation of the Iranian Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (I-SF-MPQ): Preliminary evidence of its reliability, construct validity and sensitivity in an Iranian pain population. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol 2011;3:27.  Back to cited text no. 15
Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Turner-Bowker DM, Gandek B. How to Score Version 2 of the SF-12® Health Survey (With a Supplement Documenting Version 1). Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric Incorporated; 2002.  Back to cited text no. 16
Montazeri A, Vahdaninia M, Mousavi SJ, Omidvari S. The Iranian version of 12-item short form health survey (SF-12): A population-based validation study from Tehran, Iran. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2011;9:12.  Back to cited text no. 17
Baranoff J, Hanrahan SJ, Kapur D, Connor JP. Acceptance as a process variable in relation to catastrophizing in multidisciplinary pain treatment. Eur J Pain 2013;17:101-10.  Back to cited text no. 18
Nyklícek I, Kuijpers KF. Effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction intervention on psychological well-being and quality of life: Is increased mindfulness indeed the mechanism? Ann Behav Med 2008;35:331-40.  Back to cited text no. 19
Morone NE, Lynch CS, Greco CM, Tindle HA, Weiner DK. "I felt like a new person." the effects of mindfulness meditation on older adults with chronic pain: Qualitative narrative analysis of diary entries. J Pain 2008;9:841-8.  Back to cited text no. 20
Kabat-Zinn J, Lipworth L, Burney R. The clinical use of mindfulness meditation for the self-regulation of chronic pain. J Behav Med 1985;8:163-90.  Back to cited text no. 21
Plews-Ogan M, Owens JE, Goodman M, Wolfe P, Schorling J. A pilot study evaluating mindfulness-based stress reduction and massage for the management of chronic pain. J Gen Intern Med 2005;20:1136-8.  Back to cited text no. 22
Grossman P, Niemann L, Schmidt S, Walach H. Mindfulness-based stress reduction and health benefits. A meta-analysis. J Psychosom Res 2004;57:35-43.  Back to cited text no. 23
Sephton SE, Salmon P, Weissbecker I, Ulmer C, Floyd A, Hoover K, et al. Mindfulness meditation alleviates depressive symptoms in women with fibromyalgia: Results of a randomized clinical trial. Arthritis Rheum 2007;57:77-85.  Back to cited text no. 24

Correspondence Address:
Maryam Didehdar Ardebil
HN#29 - Jomhuri, Tehran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0973-6131.158476

Rights and Permissions


  [Figure 1]

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]

This article has been cited by
1 Effects of meditation on pain intensity, physical function, quality of life and depression in adults with low back pain – A systematic review with meta-analysis
Helena Schmidt, Christian Pilat
Complementary Therapies in Medicine. 2023; 72: 102924
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 The Experience of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on Menopausal Symptoms, Sleep Disturbance, and Body Image among Patients with Breast Cancer—A Qualitative Study
Yun-Chen Chang, Gen-Min Lin, Tzuhui Angie Tseng, Elsa Vitale, Ching-Hsu Yang, Ya-Ling Yang
Current Oncology. 2023; 30(1): 1255
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Determinants of quality of life in individuals with chronic low back pain: a systematic review
Aleena Agnus Tom, Eslavath Rajkumar, Romate John, Allen Joshua George
Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine. 2022; 10(1): 124
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Protocol for mindfulness-oriented recovery enhancement (MORE) in the management of lumbosacral radiculopathy/radiculitis symptoms: A randomized controlled trial
Ryan S. Wexler, Devon J. Fox, Hannah Edmond, Johnny Lemau, Danielle ZuZero, Melissa Bollen, Diane Montenegro, Anand Parikshak, Austin R. Thompson, Nels L. Carlson, Hans L. Carlson, Anna E. Wentz, Ryan Bradley, Douglas A. Hanes, Heather Zwickey, Courtney K. Pickworth
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications. 2022; 28: 100962
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 The effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction intervention on physical function in individuals with chronic low back pain: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
K. Soundararajan, Venkatesan Prem, Thomas J. Kishen
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice. 2022; : 101623
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Meditation-Based Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Ting-Han Lin, Ka-Wai Tam, Yu-Ling Yang, Tsan-Hon Liou, Tzu-Herng Hsu, Chi-Lun Rau
Pain Medicine. 2022;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Mindfulness and Acceptance–Based Interventions in Physical Therapist Practice: The Time Is Now
Joe Tatta, Annette M Willgens, Kerstin M Palombaro
Physical Therapy. 2022; 102(3)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Effectiveness of Anapana, Body scan and Metta meditation techniques on chronic neck and shoulder region pain and disability in adult patients in Sri Lanka: study protocol for a cluster clinic-level randomised controlled trial
Aranjan Lionel Karunanayake, Emma Solomon-Moore, Nikki Coghill
Trials. 2022; 23(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 Potential Role of Yoga Intervention in the Management of Chronic Non-malignant Pain
Shivani Gupta, Surabhi Gautam, Uma Kumar, Taruna Arora, Rima Dada, Vijaya Anand
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2022; 2022: 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
10 Mindfulness Training Intervention With the Persian Version of the Mindfulness Training Mobile App for Premenstrual Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Dorsa Mazaheri Asadi, Komeil Zahedi Tajrishi, Banafsheh Gharaei
Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2022; 13
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
11 Lifestyle Medicine for Chronic Lower Back Pain: An Evidence-Based Approach
Ziya Altug
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine. 2021; 15(4): 425
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
12 Low back pain patients’ perceived effectiveness of utilizing complementary and alternative medicine: a systematic review of qualitative studies
Jeremy Y. Ng, Mrinal Anagal, Trisha Bhowmik
Journal of Complementary and Integrative Medicine. 2021; 0(0)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
13 Meditation for adults with non-specific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Larissa O. Soares, Giovanni E. Ferreira, Leonardo O. P. Costa, Leandro C. Nogueira, Ney Meziat-Filho, Felipe J. J. Reis
Scandinavian Journal of Pain. 2021; 0(0)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
14 Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of online brief Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for the improvement of productivity in the workplace: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (Preprint)
Mitsuhiro Sado, Masashi Yamada, Akira Ninomiya, Maki Nagaoka, Naho Goto, Akihiro Koreki, Atsuo Nakagawa, Zindel Segal, Masaru Mimura
JMIR Research Protocols. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
15 Effects of Combining Meditation Techniques on Short-Term Memory, Attention, and Affect in Healthy College Students
Samani Unnata Pragya, Neelam D. Mehta, Bassam Abomoelak, Parvin Uddin, Pushya Veeramachaneni, Naina Mehta, Stephanie Moore, Melissa Jean-Francois, Stephanie Garcia, Samani Chaitanya Pragya, Devendra I. Mehta
Frontiers in Psychology. 2021; 12
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
16 Integrated Meditation and Exercise Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Pilot of a Combined Nonpharmacological Intervention Focused on Reducing Disability and Pain in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain
Anna M Polaski, Amy L Phelps, Thomas J Smith, Eric R Helm, Natalia E Morone, Kimberly A Szucs, Matthew C Kostek, Benedict J Kolber
Pain Medicine. 2021; 22(2): 444
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
17 The use of complementary and alternative medicines, and quality of life in patients under hemodialysis: A survey in southeast Iran
Mahlagha Dehghan, Zakieh Namjoo, Amir Bahrami, Hanieh Tajedini, Zahra Shamsaddini-lori, Ahmad Zarei, Moazameh Dehghani, Mohammad-Sajjad Ranjbar, Farshid Rafiee Sarbijan Nasab
Complementary Therapies in Medicine. 2020; 51: 102431
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
18 Effectiveness of walking versus mind-body therapies in chronic low back pain
Ildephonse Nduwimana, Félix Nindorera, Jean Louis Thonnard, Oyene Kossi
Medicine. 2020; 99(35): e21969
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
19 Systematic scoping review of interactions between analgesic drug therapy and mindfulness-based interventions for chronic pain in adults: current evidence and future directions
Rex Park, Mohammed Mohiuddin, Patricia A. Poulin, Tim Salomons, Robert Edwards, Howard Nathan, Chris Haley, Ian Gilron
PAIN Reports. 2020; 5(6): e868
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
20 Non-Opioid Perioperative Pain Strategies for the Clinician: A Narrative Review
Alan David Kaye, Amanda L. Granier, Andrew J. Garcia, Sam F. Carlson, Mitch C. Fuller, Alex R. Haroldson, Shane W. White, Owen L. Krueger, Matthew B. Novitch, Elyse M. Cornett
Pain and Therapy. 2020; 9(1): 25
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
21 Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) for improving health, quality of life and social functioning in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Michael de Vibe, Arild Bjørndal, Sabina Fattah, Gunvor M Dyrdal, Even Halland, Emily E Tanner-Smith
Campbell Systematic Reviews. 2017; 13(1): 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]


    Similar in PUBMED
  Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

   Inclusion criteria
   Exclusion criteria
    McGill Pain ques...
    Quality of life ...
   Statistical analysis
   Comparative results
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded542    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 21    

Recommend this journal