International Journal of Yoga
Users online: 449 
Ahead of print | Login 
 
Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size 
About us Editors Current Issue Past Issues Instructions submission Subscribe Advertise
 


 
   Table of Contents     
GUEST EDITORIAL  
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 87-88
Toward building evidence for yoga


Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication5-Jun-2014
 

How to cite this article:
Gangadhar B N. Toward building evidence for yoga. Int J Yoga 2014;7:87-8

How to cite this URL:
Gangadhar B N. Toward building evidence for yoga. Int J Yoga [serial online] 2014 [cited 2018 Dec 10];7:87-8. Available from: http://www.ijoy.org.in/text.asp?2014/7/2/87/133868
Ayurveda and later the World Health Organization defined health that includes both physical and mental well-being. Ayurveda also brings in the spiritual dimension. Yoga as a lifestyle will allow us to enjoy the best of health as we transcend into better spiritual health. [1] Understandably, scientists who have developed tools to measure health have used the same tools to corroborate the role of Yoga. Positive effects of Yoga on health are endorsed by its illness-alleviation effects, Yoga therapy. If Yoga has to be prescribed for these roles, improvement in health or reduction of disease, present standards demand best evidence-base. Hence, the protagonists of Yoga have taken up the task of building evidence. Trials are conducted in healthy as well as diseased subjects examining the effects of Yoga. These effects encompass mere experiences of the subjects, assessments by researchers and laboratory tests. The latter include biochemical, physiological, neuroimaging and even genetic tests. The required research rigor such as randomization, blinding and using appropriate controls still remain a challenge in Yoga research. These make the evidence-building for Yoga an uphill task.

The strength of evidence varies from study to study. Case reports offer initial support for Yoga application for a required effect. Ebnezar et al., [2] used a Yoga module in a patient who had already undergone total knee replacement and was advised bilateral hip replacement. There were substantial benefits experienced by the subject after Yoga intervention. Authors opined that Yoga must be offered before options such as joint replacement are considered. Cross-sectional data looking at differences between Yoga practitioners and matched subjects who did not practice Yoga is the next higher level of research to build evidence. For example, Infante et al., [3] in their short communication found a better immune status in those who were practicing meditation than control subjects. Likewise, Vinchurkar et al., [4] found mindfulness was better in the long term meditators than non-meditators. Attribution of the researched effect to Yoga is difficult in such studies. Both types of researches (case reports and cross-sectional) provide a lead for the potential effects of Yoga and hence are useful. In the case reports one gets insight into the applicability as well as feasibility of Yoga in a given condition. This may also provide some insight into possible side-effects, if any, of Yoga. It is equally important to be sensitive to reportage of any adverse events following the introduction of Yoga. In this issue too, Holton and Barry [5] report the consequences of experiencing adverse events following Yoga from a survey. It is reassuring to note that the adverse events are rare and does not form a barrier to Yoga practice. Whether the same is applicable to Yoga therapy in patients with different illnesses is useful information to the clinicians prescribing Yoga. Just as attribution to Yoga cannot be inferred to beneficial effects from cross-sectional studies, yoga causing adverse events too cannot be definitively inferred. Recording of adverse events helps in taking precautions when advising Yoga in select disease conditions.

Prospective designs with a control group/condition are hence desirable. In their study Bhavanani et al., [6] compared the effects on hypertension of different yogic practices. Such a research has value in optimizing Yoga practices to obtain a desirable effect, particularly in therapy. Randomized trials on the other hand possess even greater strength. Attribution to Yoga for the effects studied is more definitive. Mooventhan and Khode [7] compared Bhramari pranayama with a controlled condition of not doing pranayama in a randomized prospective design. They found that pulmonary functions were better in those who practiced Bhramari. Similarly, Talwadkar et al., [8] conducted a randomized controlled study in elderly and studied the effects of Trataka in comparison to wait listing. Neuropsychological test performance in Trataka group was better after exposure. In Yoga research, randomization and choice of controlled condition are both challenges, more so in the clinical situation when one applies Yoga for therapy as an add-on or as a sole agent. Yoga being a "time-tested" practice, subjects ask with a surprise why this should be tested again/now. This 'surprise' could lower the consent rates in addition to other barriers for Yoga. [9] In a recent study on schizophrenia comparing add-on Yoga with exercise or wait list, the researcher had to contact over 1000 patients to be able to obtain consent from just over 100 patients. [10]

In several of the measures used to study the effects of Yoga there can be a rater or subject bias. For example, reporting of severity of pain, depression, etc., can be influenced. Hence the trials demand blinding of the rater, the subject and the laboratories as well. In clinical drug trials therefore, identical-looking capsules/tablets are used in place the control condition. Patients/experimental subjects as well as the assessing doctors will hence be blind to intervention. Hence the reporting of effects remains objective. Blinding minimizes placebo effect. Blinding in studies of Yoga is even more difficult. The closest that has been possible is use of exercise as a control to Yoga asanas. [10] Still, there is no guarantee that blinding would occur. Alternatively an outcome parameter has to be chosen that is least likely to be influenced by the placebo effect. Such a parameter will also be free of "rater-bias". Some examples include a structural measure of an organ (brain) in imaging, changes in the gene or its expression etc., With advances in molecular biology and related technology, it is likely scientists could unravel basic mechanisms of Yoga and produce more robust evidence of effects of Yoga as desired by modern clinicians.

 
   References Top

1.Varambally S, Gangadhar BN. Yoga: A spiritual practice with therapeutic value in psychiatry. Asian J Psychiatr 2012;5:186-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Ebnezar J, Bali YM, John R, Gupta O. Role of integrated approach of yoga therapy in a failed post-total knee replacement of bilateral knees. Int J Yoga 2014;8:[In press].  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Infante JR, Peran F, Rayo JI, Serrano J, Domínguez ML, Garcia L, Duran C, et al. Immune cells in transcendental meditation practitioners. Int J Yoga 2014;8:[In press].  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Vinchurkar SA, Deepeshwar S, Naveen KV. Self-reported measures of mindfulness in meditators and non-meditators - A cross-sectional study. Int J Yoga 2014;8:[In press].  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Holton MK, Barry AE. Do side-effects/injuries from yoga practice result in discontinued use? Results of a national survey. Int J Yoga 2014;8:[In press].  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Bhavanani AB, Ramanathan M, Balaji R, Pushpa D. Comparative immediate effect of different yoga asanas on heart rate and blood pressure in healthy young volunteers. Int J Yoga 2014;8:[In press].  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Mooventhan A, Khode V. Effect of bhramari pranayama and om chanting on pulmonary function in healthy individuals - A prospective randomized control trial. Int J Yoga 2014;8:[In press].  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Talwadkar S, Jagannathan A, Raghuram N. Effect of Trataka on cognitive functions in the elderly. Int J Yoga 2014;8:[In press].  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Baspure S, Jagannathan A, Kumar S, Varambally S, Thirthalli J, Venkatasubramanain G, et al. Barriers to yoga therapy as an add-on treatment for schizophrenia in India. Int J Yoga 2012;5:70-3.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
10.Varambally S, Gangadhar BN, Thirthalli J, Jagannathan A, Kumar S, Venkatasubramanian G, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of add-on yogasana intervention in stabilized outpatient schizophrenia: Randomized controlled comparison with exercise and waitlist. Indian J Psychiatry 2012;54:227-32.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  

Top
Correspondence Address:
B N Gangadhar
Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0973-6131.133868

Rights and Permissions




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2108    
    Printed57    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded64    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal